Archives - Emergency Operations System Used to Promote Election Task Force
September 2004
City of Charlottesville: Emergency Operations System Used to Promote Election Task Force
Search for:

Home

At 12:36 p.m. on Monday, September 20th, the phone rang. The Caller ID window showed "Emergency Operations 971-6927."

The call was a recorded message urging attendence at a forum to hear about the ward system and the direct election of the mayor. There were passages quoted from a publicity release sent out by the Charlottesville Elections Task Force.

The Charge from Council

The Charlottesville Elections Study Task Force was created by the Charlottesville City Council in April 2004 and charged by Council members to consider a series of issues including:

1) Explore the concept of directly electing the mayor.
2) Explore the concept of restructuring the Council election by wards or a combination of wards and at-large.
3) Explore the concept of enlarging the number of Council members.
4) Explore other best practices relating to representation of citizens, including but not limited to remuneration and term limitation.

The message ended by suggesting a call to Charlottesville Registrar Sheri Iachetta (970-3250) for further information.

When we called back to 971-6927, we learned that it was the "City Watch Automated Voice Service System." Checking further with Kaye Harden, Emergency Services Coordinator for the Charlottesville/Albemarle/University of Virginia Emergency Communications Center (which runs the City Watch system) we learn that the automated phoning "... was a non-official use of the system, and we put a stop to it."

According to Coordinator Harden, the City Watch system is intended to call lots of people in a short time -- to round up emergency services workers, or to alert the public to a threat. A member of the Charlottesville City government tells us that there has been an understanding that the system could also be used for neighborhood announcements. In this case, over 3,000 calls were made city-wide.

The protocol for use of the system specifically states that non-emergency uses must be approved by an emergency-response agency, and that in no case is it for use for city-wide (or county-wide) calling. (At a calling rate of 800 to 1200 calls per hour, a city-wide distribution would take above 10 hours.)

Telephone Notification Systems

City Watch, the system operated by the Emergency Services office can quickly call lots of phone numbers from lists in a database and deliver a prepared message. Communities purchase these systems with the intention of using them to alert people to:

  • "Missing persons searches
  • Hazardous materials incidents
  • Criminal activity alerts
  • Hurricane evacuations
  • Sex offender relocations
  • Neighborhood watch programs and more!" (Temple Terrace, FL, municipal website)

Earlier this year the news wires carried a story demonstrating the use of such a system in a very localized emergency:

"Sheriff's Deputies [in Forsyth County, Georgia] responded early Tuesday afternoon to a suicide threat call in the Hamptons Subdivision. A resident had barricaded himself in his home and was threatening to shoot himself. That's when the Reverse 9-1-1 system was called into use.
As Sheriff's Office negotiators talked with the subject, the Reverse 911 system was programmed to call every nearby home, advising residents of the ongoing situation and asking them to remain in their homes until the standoff was resolved.
In addition, the Sheriff's Office contacted the Board of Education and made arrangements to have the school buses for that area delayed. Parents of the children who were on those buses were also notified that their children were safe and would be delivered home as soon as the situation was over.
The standoff was resolved peacefully at 3:30 p.m. when the suspect surrendered to deputies and was taken into custody. As soon as the situation ended the Reverse 911 System immediately called every number that had previously been called and advised them that they could resume their normal activities...." (Associated Press, April 1, 2004)

Ned Michie is president of the Greenbrier Neighborhood Association in Charlottesville. He tells us that a year or so ago, he learned of the City Watch system. Early on, he was told, it was used in the Barracks Road Shopping Center to notify merchants about crimes involving other businesses and to warn of fraud and scam schemes to watch out for. He was encouraged to create a list of people in the neighborhood who wished to be included for neighborhood-specific non-emergency messages

He does not recall being offered training for himself--"it would have been our local patrol officer who actually used the thing," he says. But due to changes within CPD and lack of interest in the Greenbrier community, nothing more was done to promote use of the system there.

WVIR-TV29, the local NBC outlet, reports that on September 23, the system was put to use to alert a neighborhood to the threat from a peeping Tom.

There are some simple issues that need to be resolved when a community implements such a system. Unlisted and cellphone numbers are not in the database; deaf folks need to be contacted through a special system; and some especially helpful answering machines won't accept automated messages. (Dave Sagarin, September 24, 2004)

Maurice Jones, our City Director of Communications, explains that Ann Reinicke [Republican candidate for the Charlottesville City Council in 2004 and member of the Orangedale Neighborhood Association], as a "neighborhood leader" had received training from the Charlottesville Police Department in the use of the phone system. Jones says that City Watch has been used by community groups for the purpose of making announcements of general interest -- "for the purpose of notifying neighbors." What has not been clear, he says, is what level of authorization a person needed before using the system for a non-emergency purpose.

In this instance, according to the Communications Director, Mrs. Reinicke "should have cleared it with Kaye Harden's office, or at least with the Charlottesville P.D." She has since met with the emergency communications folk and the city manager's office, and "now understands that not getting authorization in the first place, was not a good thing."

Jones tells us that this point will be made clear to all the other authorized users of the system. We are waiting to learn more about who these users are and how they get to be authorized.

If you are an authorized user of the City Watch phone system, or if you have an opinion about the use of the terror-threat hotline to get the public out to a forum, let us know at george@ loper.org.

For more, see Ann Reinicke's Telephone Invite Gets Questioned.

You are also welcome to send comments for attribution about the questions raised by the task force to george@loper.org. For more, see Lloyd Snook Comments on Ward Systems.


Comments? Questions? Write me at george@loper.org.