State funding fails schools
In both basic and higher education, Virginia is failing to meet core
requirements even those that are legally mandated. Two examples:
The state still is not funding its share of the Standards of Quality
for public schools.
And, after failing to keep up support to public colleges and universities,
requiring those institutions to raise tuition prices, it is now failing
to keep pace in its support of student financial aid.
For education in kindergarten through grade 12, Virginia is at least
making limited progress.
The state is supposed to pay 55 percent of the costs of the Standards
of Quality, which set minimum requirements for public school divisions.
Local governments pay the rest. Local school officials say Virginia has
long failed to fully meet its mandate. Currently, the state is behind in
its support by about half a [billion] dollars but the picture could
be worse.
As far back as 2001, a budget shortfall of about $1 [billion] in Virginias
SOQ share had been predicted for the fiscal year ending June 30. Legislators
have struggled to make up the difference, and they have managed to get about
halfway there despite a recession that shrank state revenues. Its
not where they ought to be, but their effort has prevented the problem from
getting even worse.
Some educators complain that the General Assembly trimmed the shortfall
in the basic standards by cutting special programs and shifting that money
to the SOQs. That results in no net gain for education, they say.
Maybe so. But the states obligation is to fund the SOQs, and the
premise behind that arrangement is that extra programs will be supported
only if extra funds are available. When they are not, it only makes sense
to cut funding to nonessential programs. The state must live up to its obligation
to ensure adequate, basic education for all Virginia students. When that
is done, it may spend money for added programs.
Meanwhile, needy college students are suffering the consequences of state
policies regarding tuition.
In 1994, the legislature decided that tuitions at state schools had been
rising too fast, and ordered a cap at 3 percent. Then it froze tuitions
during much of the 90s. Then in 2000 it ordered schools to roll back
tuition prices by 20 percent. Now that it finds itself apparently unable
to continue an adequate level of tax support to these tax-supported schools,
it has freed them to unleash tuition prices.
Higher tuitions are especially hard on low-income students. So the state
has a goal of supplying financial aid equivalent to 50 percent of tuition
prices. Is it doing so? No. The level of actual state aid had already dropped
to 42 percent. Next year it will decline even further, to just 36 percent.
So not only has Virginia made financial aid more necessary, it has failed
to fund enough aid to meet the need it created. The only bright spot in
this scenario is that Virginia colleges and universities are still relatively
affordable institutions even after the average 9 percent boost that occurred
in 2002.
But under both law and policy, Virginia has financial obligations to
its students that it is not meeting. Impulsive fiscal decisions and failure
to hold a steady, wise course have hurt the states ability to meet
its responsibilities. A new philosophy is necessary one that looks
to the long term for the health of Virginias education, not just to
the next election. (Daily Progress Editorial, June 24, 2003) |