George,

Imagine for a moment, Londoners granting an easement through Hyde Park to better enable the citizenry easier access to the commercial area of that great city; or, France with the cooperation of the Parisian government, dissecting a portion of the Luxembourg or Tuileries Gardens for the greater convenience of the motorists.

First, it would never happen; even to suggest such an idea would probably bring back the Rack or the Guillotine. Secondly, these parks are monuments to humanity, the automobile is largely a monument to ego and greed and the citizens of these nations know this.

We should work to preserve our parks and recreation facilities, not gift even a small portion for the "convenience" of the motorist. We are fortunate to live in an area surrounded by natural beauty. I grew up in such an area,but because those leaders in that area of northern New Jersey decided "progress" trumped trees and open spaces, this area now looks like one continuous version of Sunset Strip.

Back then, we were told we could have the best of both worlds. Right! We got monumental traffic jams bordering on gridlock and the insatiable need for easier access created a never ending nightmare. I dread going near the place! It is possible for human beings, with enlightened leadership, to alter their habits, maybe we can be persuaded that a healthy dose of patience and forbearance, we can reach our destinations without sacrificing our parks and the quality of our lives.

Isn't it worth the effort?

Harry Tenney (electronic mail, December 24, 2003)