|
|
|
|||||
|
"The University of Virginias student-run newspaper is among 14 recipients of the Jefferson Muzzles a dubious honor bestowed to entities that are deemed to have acted counter to the principles of free speech. Sponsored by the Charlottesville-based Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression, this years crop of the Jefferson Muzzles include broadcasters CBS Radio and MSNBC, the Texas State Democratic Party, the Federal Emergency Management Agency and U.S. Sen. Jay Rockefeller. The 2008 recipients will be announced today. One of the winners, the Federal Communications Commission, will receive a Lifetime Muzzle for decades of what the Jefferson Center considers to be inconsistent regulation of indecency on the nations airwaves, which has led to a profound chilling effect on broadcasters. For example, more than 150 TV stations declined to air the World War II film Saving Private Ryan out of fear that the FCC would levy heavy fines for the movies violent imagery and battlefield swear words. Though the FCC did not hit any stations with fines in that case, it did condemn an NYPD Blue episode about the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks that featured swear words. A call to the FCC for comment was not returned. In the Muzzles 17-year history, there has been only one other Lifetime Muzzle recipient: Rudy Giuliani in 1999, for what the center called at the time an ongoing pattern of stifling of speech and the press as mayor of New York City. This years sole local recipient was the 2007 managing board of UVas student newspaper, the Cavalier Daily. The students were selected because Cav Daily editors forced the resignation of cartoonist Grant Woolard after his comic strip Quirksmith sparked a sit-in protest of 200 students outside the papers newsroom last fall. Woolards strip, titled Ethiopian Food Fight, depicted nearly naked and emaciated African men fighting each other with sticks, pillows, furniture and other items. They forced a cartoonist out of his position essentially because people were offended, said Robert ONeil, director of the Thomas Jefferson Center and a former UVa president. I hate to fault student editors and I hate to fault a student newspaper. But they reviewed the cartoon. They published the cartoon. And then when theres an outrage, the sacrificial party is the cartoonist. Herb Ladley, a former UVa student who was the Cav Dailys editor in chief during the brouhaha, wrote in an e-mail that he believes it is a cheap shot for the Thomas Jefferson Center to take aim at a newspaper operated entirely by hardworking students. It shows the utter frivolity of an organization that claims to speak for Thomas Jefferson that they would go after a college newspaper and a group of students who work hard every single day to do something productive, he said. It is further disconcerting that they would focus on speech, in this case a cartoon, that had no intrinsic value. The Cavalier Daily promotes freedom of expression every day, as a sounding board for issues of importance of students. Thats free speech in practice, and if the Thomas Jefferson Center were serious, they would recognize its value. ONeil likened the Cavalier Daily case to the firing of radio host Don Imus by CBS Radio and MSNBC after Imus made derogatory and racially insensitive comments about the Rutgers womens basketball team. The broadcasters knew Imus had a tendency to be offensive, ONeil said, but when offended people complained, they threw him under the bus. In both the Imus and Cavalier Daily cases, ONeil said, organizations that benefit each day from the privileges included in the First Amendment did not live up to its ideals. Others getting Muzzles: The Jefferson Muzzles, ONeil said, are intended to both entertain and enlighten people about the need for free speech protections. ONeil said he also hopes they encourage potential censors across the country to think twice before muzzling speech. At the very least, we hope that they stop the people named from
doing the same thing again, he said. School administrators and
others in responsible positions are probably at least vaguely aware of this
criticism and hopefully theyll be discouraged from doing similar things.
" (Brian McNeill, The Daily Progress, April 8, 2008)
|