Archives - Trent Lott Lifts Veil on Legislative Holds
Mar 1999
106th Congress: Trent Lott Lifts Veil on Legislative Holds
Search for:

Home

 

"Senate leaders have ended the secrecy with which senators can put 'holds' on legislation or nominations, a controversial practice used to delay or block action, especially at the end of a session" (Helen Dewar, The Washington Post, March 4, 1999).

"While senators can still use holds to stall action, they will lose their power to do so with anonymity that has made holds such a powerful weapon in the arsenal of obstruction" (Helen Dewar, The Washington Post, March 4, 1999).

"From now on, a senator who wants to put a hold on a bill or nomination will have to notify its sponsor and the committee with jurisdiction over the issue and give written notification to party leaders. Holds imposed by staff members will no longer be honored unless accompanied by their senator's written notification by the end of the next business day" (Helen Dewar, The Washington Post, March 4, 1999).

The decision, announced by Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-Miss.) and Minority Leader Thomas A. Daschle (D-S.D.) in a letter to colleagues that was disclosed yesterday amounted to a personal victory for Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), who have been fighting for three years to end the secrecy of holds" (Helen Dewar, The Washington Post, March 4, 1999).

"What it means is that the fog is starting to lift over the Senate,' said Wyden. 'Secret holds have become indefensible ... and the Senate has known it for some time, but this institution changes slowly'" (Helen Dewar, The Washington Post, March 4, 1999).

"'It will make the Senate more accountable and also help us be more productive because there's a great deal of wasted energy by members find out who's holding up their billl' that could better be spent trying to resolve the problem that led to the hold, added Grassley" (Helen Dewar, The Washington Post, March 4, 1999).

"While holds are not specifically sanctioned by Senate rules, they are routinely honored by Senate leaders as an advance warning of other delaying action, such as a filibuster. They were begun as a courtesy but over the years became an instrument of obstruction" (Helen Dewar, The Washington Post, March 4, 1999).


Comments? Questions? Write me at george@loper.org.